Justice III

The Crime: Embezzlement of a pack of Cat Treats from the countertop to benefit an obviously starving Woofie

A handsome black and white hound lounges on a dog bed with a pack of cat treats between his front paws.  His eyes look kind of guilty.

The Alleged Criminal: Apollo, Social Justice Warrior, aged 6 months

A handsome black and white kitten stalks straight towards the camera.

The Verdict: Not Guilty by reason of the treats not being the kind preferred by Cats and therefore fair game to embezzle for the benefit of the Woofies

—Darth Vader, Cat Court Chief Justice

8 thoughts on “Justice III

  1. Apollo, if you were representing yourself in this matter, I hope you made the point that a generous donation of unwanted treats to a worthy cause is not the legal definition of embezzlement and no feline jury in the land would convict you of such. -Max

    Liked by 1 person

  2. This is true. Not every treat is cat tasty. In fact a large majority aren’t. Woofies are always welcome to cleaning up cat rejects. I mean, in the hierarchy of life, that’s the purrrrpose of a Woofie, right? 😹

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to sevencatsandcounting Cancel reply